God Bless America .... Pretty Please?
Ok, so I get home from work and (somehow) end up in front of the TV. Except this time I'm not watching some pointless sitcom or something. I watched C-SPAN for two hours. They're talking about the national budget. At the moment I turned it on, there were a few Republican representatives griping about how the Democrats were going to raise taxes. We are to believe that this would be bad, because the money the nation gets from taxes actually goes up when you lower taxes, because people have more money to invest, and to start new companies with, and as a result everyone is better off and can pay more taxes anyway. They proposed instead that taxes should be lowered further, toward the end of prompting more of this same effect.
So the Republicans are done. Now it's the Democrats' turn. It took all of about 5 seconds after the representative set up his little easel and big cardboard diagrams for him to start whining about how President Bush has increased the national debt by a few trillion dollars. He argues, then, that the President has borrowed money from other nations in order to help fund a tax cut for Americans making more than $400,000 every year. That is a nearly exact quotation. So now I'm to believe that, if this representative is speaking accurately, America borrowed $3 trillion and handed it to a bunch of rich Americans. But the fun doesn't stop there! We're not planning to raise taxes, but we are going to lower taxes, says the Democrat. And while we're lowering taxes, we will increase spending on education, veterans, and healthcare. Gee, doesn't this sound familiar? Oh yeah, that's the same promise that President Bush campaigned on in 2004. So it sounds to me like the Democrats are saying that President Bush's budget plan has put the country in a ridiculous and insurmountable amount of debt, and yet they are proposing the very thing he did.
Where can our country go? This is not politics, this is some sad kind of schoolchild playground war. The Elephant gang and the Donkey gang are so blinded by their own superiority that they refuse to see past the shortsightedness of their own team and accept that the other side might have anything valuable to contribute. Ok, so there were several Republicans who got involved in scandals of some sort. Therefore, all Republicans are bad. So there are some Democrats who think taxes and spending should both be increased. Therefore, all Democrats think taxes and spending should be increased. HELLO! It's not rocket sceince! It's BASIC LOGIC! What if our congresspeople would, for once, forget what "side of the aisle" they're on and just look at an issue as no more than it is. A Republican proposition to lower taxes should be treated no differently than a Democrat proposition to lower taxes. And yet, if the Democrats have the majority, the Republican bill will lose simply because it was a Republican who created it. Does no one else see it? Surely, you'd think that if enough regular citizens would speak up on an issue, politicians would have to actually read the Constitution for once and realize that they are supposed to be representing their districts, not representing their party. What I'm seeing is top-down government, not the bottom-up government that was intended. Authority is supposed to come from the people, through the congress, into the laws. But instead it comes from the majority in Congress, into the laws, down to the people. Never mind who started the war, never mind what party that last scandal involved - why can't politicians vote based on the merits of the propositions rather than their affiliations?
Vote for Nader!


8 Comments:
Matthew, you are far too astute to be a citizen of this country. You should move away promptly before the smarts are leached right out of you.
I too get frustrated with the affiliation thing: I consider myself a Republican (but how can that be??? Republicans are old white men! ALL women are Democrats!) but certainly don't agree with everything the party does or says. I prefer to vote as a sort of hybrid and think outside party lines. I'm baffled and irritated by the ubiquitousness of assumption, too: that Republicans think ______ while Democrats think _______. What's with the need to define things so narrowly? I swear: people WANT to be told what to think and not be required to use their own common sense and/or powers of observation. YOU should run for Congress; I would vote for you...so long as you don't run as a DEMOCRAT....ha ha, I crack myself up. Run anyway, so I can sell stories about you ("He claimed to own not one pair of jeans, AND he was always.... blowing...... HIS NOSE") to the tabloids.
Besides: what were you doing watching C-Span? Wasn't "American Idol" on????? (Speaking of having IQ points evaporate....)
Yeah, I generally think of myself the same way, being not strictly defined by a party. (After my rant, how could I be? Heh.) There was a movie that came out last year... "Man of the Year"... which was all about an independent presidential candidate, and it made fun of how much money people spend to get elected.
I've heard on the news about some downright scary reports of the campaign spending that's already happened. I mean, it's the beginning of 2007... good grief. But the guy I was listening to estimated that in the first quarter of 2007, candidates will have spent about $300M, collectively. And then compare that to the number of people who actually care at this point, and they're spending around $1500 per vote. Uh, care to do that for the entire 2,000,000 voters? Here, hand me $1,500 and I might think about it... but your last mega-super-over-produced commercial didn't help much, and yet I'm sure it cost much more.
Heh, I'm not quite sure... I think it was because I wanted to make my sister bored enough to leave so I could watch something else. But we started laughing at how they always say stuff like "I yield to the gentlemen from Alabama" and "I thank the gentleman for yielding" and "I now yield back to the gentleman."
(er, make that 200,000,000 voters in that second-last comment)
Gee, I was going to point out that error but you beat me to it...ha ha! Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!
Wait...you watched communist-span for two hours?? Wouldn't playing WoW been healthier? ;)
On a more serious note, I do wonder what it will take to turn this country around.
People should read this.
Post a Comment
<< Home